Thursday, September 24, 2015

YELLEN TO ALLOW RATE HIKE BY YEARS END

From USA TODAY 
Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen told economists gathered Thursday that the conditions she sees now would allow the U.S. central bank to boost short-term interest rates this year.
Investors have been nervously awaiting the Federal Reserve's move to start hiking rates for the first time in years. The move toward higher rates would lift U.S. short-term interest rates above their current levels at near zero. Yellen's remarks where made at a lecture at the University of Massachusetts' Department of Economics.


Financial markets have been struggling to deal with the pressures that appear at odds with each other. Higher interest rates, historically, have created a headwind for stocks and caused returns to take a hit. However, the apparently reluctance of the Fed to boost rates is stoking worries the economic slowdown in Asia is more of a macro concern than long believed.

TY  LAFFOON 

Thursday, September 17, 2015

No Hiking!!: Fed keeps benchmark rate near zero..... Ty Laffoon

Today the Fed stated NO HIKING !!!

Citing global economic weakness and financial market turmoil, the Federal Reserve agreed Thursday to keep its benchmark interest rate near zero despite the rapidly improving U.S. labor market.
But Fed policymakers' forecast indicates they still expect to bump up the federal funds rate this year for the first time in nearly a decade, with meetings scheduled for October and December. Their projections, however, show they expect to raise it even more gradually over the long-term than they previously signaled.
Richmond Fed chief Jeffrey Lacker was the lone dissenter.
The decision capped the most dramatic run-up to a Fed meeting in recent memory, with economists split on whether the central bank would raise its key rate, which has been near zero since the 2008 financial crisis and affects borrowing costs for consumers and businesses across the economy.
In a statement after a two-day meeting, the Fed said, "Recent global economic and financial developments may restrain economic activity somewhat and are likely to put further downward pressure on inflation in the near-term."


This USA TODAY article shared  by Ty Laffoon
Fed policymakers now expect just one rate hike this year that would push the funds rate to 0.375% from the current 0.125%, according to their median forecast. They also expect a slower rise, with the benchmark rate increasing to 1.375% by the end of 2016 and 2.625% by the end of 2017, down from its previous estimates of 1.65% and 2.875%, respectively. The Fed also now expects its longer run normal rate to be 3.5%, below its previous 3.75% forecast.
The central bank said "the labor market continued to improve, with solid job gains and declining unemployment." It said consumer spending and business investment have advanced moderately while the housing market "has improved further." But amid the overseas troubles, it said exports have been "soft."
With the U.S. economy rebounding more strongly in the second quarter after a slowdown early in the year, the Fed raised its median forecast for economic growth this year to 2.1% from 1.9% in June. But after the recent global and market troubles, it lowered its projection for 2016 to 2.3% from 2.5% in June.

Ty Laffoon
And with the 5.1% unemployment rate already below the Fed's previous year-end forecast, it now expects the jobless rate to be 5% by the end of 2015, down from its June estimate of 5.3%.It expects unemployment to fall to 4.8% by the end of 2016, below its June forecast 5.1%.
Yet the central bank also expects a more modest rise in inflation, providing it more leeway to nudge up rates gently. It slightly lowered its inflation forecast to 1.7% in 2016 and 1.9% in 2017, leaving it below its 2% annual target even in two years.
Supporting the case for a Fed move is a 5.1% unemployment rate that's already at the central bank's long-run target, average monthly job gains of 212,000 this year and healthy economic growth of 3.7% at an annual rate in the second quarter.
Waiting until later in the year or early 2016 might force the Fed to hoist rates more rapidly when currently meager inflation eventually heats up, a move that could destabilize markets.
But recent news of China's economic slowdown, and the resulting turmoil in global and U.S. stocks, prompted Fed officials to temper expectations for a rate hike this week. New York Fed President William Dudley said last month the case for an imminent move had become "less compelling."
Investors were placing just 23% odds on the Fed increasing rates this week, according to the futures market.
The Fed likely wants to assess how the recent U.S. market selloff affects the economy and if the volatility reflects more weakness abroad than economic reports indicate, Barclays Capital said before the meeting. While U.S. exports to China comprise less than 1% of the nation's gross domestic product, Chinese trade with other countries could have stronger ripple effects on the economy.
Fed officials are also hesitant to further roil already fragile markets, according to Barclays. And they've said the risk of moving prematurely and derailing the six-year-old recovery outweighs the hazards of acting late and having to hike rates more sharply to keep pace with inflation.
For now, at least, annual inflation remains well below the Fed's 2% target. The Labor Department said this week its consumer price index fell 0.1% in August because of tumbling gasoline prices. And while the Fed expects oil and gas prices to rebound, a measure of inflation that excludes food and energy costs and is more closely watched by the Fed edged up just 0.1%, at least partly because the strong dollar is holding down import prices for consumers.
Fed Chair Janet Yellen has said she doesn't need to see inflation accelerate to raise rates, but must be confident it will drift toward the Fed's 2% target over the medium term. Some economists say the 5.1% unemployment rate already heralds a coming surge in wages and prices as employers compete for fewer available workers.
But annual pay growth has been stuck near a sluggish 2% pace, possibly reflecting an excess labor supply that includes part-time workers who prefer full-time jobs and discouraged Americans resuming job searches after years on the sidelines. If that's the case, the Fed may want to keep rates low longer to stimulate the economy so more of those workers can find full-time jobs.
Before the release of the Fed's statement to reporters, a coalition of worker advocacy groups called Fed Up gathered outside holding signs such as, "Whose recovery?" and chanting, "Don't raise the interest rates!"
"The Fed should not make a decision to slow down the economy without hearing from the people it will affect," said Ady Barkan, the head of the group


Shared by Ty Laffoon
ty@primemortgageloans.net


Monday, September 14, 2015

Top 5 Reverse Mortgage Myths and Facts from Ty Laffoon

Top 5 Reverse Mortgage Myths and Facts
Your Reverse Mortgage Guide to a
Profitable Niche Market






Myth 1
The lender owns
the home.

You will retain the title and ownership during the life of the loan, as long as you continue to live in the home, maintain your home and pay your property taxes and homeowners insurance.


Myth 2
The home must be free and clear of any existing mortgages.

Actually, many borrowers use the reverse mortgage loan to pay off an existing mortgage and eliminate monthly mortgage payments.


Myth 3
Once loan proceeds are received, you pay taxes on them.

Reverse mortgage loan proceeds are tax-free. Money you receive from refinancing your home, regardless of the type of loan is not taxable. If you are on a low income government subsidy, check with the appropriate agency for any impact on your eligibility.


Myth 4
There are restrictions on how the proceeds may be used.

The cash proceeds from the reverse mortgage loan can be used for any reason. Many borrowers use it to supplement their retirement income, delay receiving social security benefits, pay off debt, pay for medical expenses, remodel their home, or help their adult children.


Myth 5
Only low income seniors need reverse mortgages.

Many affluent senior borrowers with high dollar homes and healthy retirement assets are using reverse mortgage loans as part of their financial and estate planning. We work closely with financial professionals and estate attorneys to protect your estate and enhance your overall quality and enjoyment of life.





Forward from Ty Laffoon 

Friday, September 11, 2015

Ty Laffoon is now doing Reverse Mortgages



Looking to get a Reserve Mortgage?  Give us a call so we can get you more information on the program .We will get you the highest quality counseling available before we move forward .

A Reverse Mortgage or Home Equity Conversion Mortgage (HECM) is a special type of home loan for older homeowners that requires no monthly mortgage payments. Borrowers are still responsible for property taxes and homeowner’s insurance. Reverse mortgages allow elders to access the home equity they have built up in their homes now, and defer payment of the loan until they die, sell, or move out of the home. Because there are no required mortgage payments on a reverse mortgage, the interest is added to the loan balance each month. The rising loan balance can eventually grow to exceed the value of the home, particularly in times of declining home values or if the borrower continues to live in the home for many years.

  However, the borrower (or the borrower’s estate) is generally not required to repay any additional loan balance in excess of the value of the home.[1] Specific rules for reverse mortgage transactions vary depending on the laws of the jurisdiction.

   In a conventional mortgage, the homeowner makes a monthly payment to the lender. After each payment, the homeowner's equity increases by the amount of the principal included in the payment. In a reverse mortgage, a homeowner is not required to make monthly payments. If payments are not made, interest is added to the loan's balance.[1] Although the "rising loan balance can eventually grow to exceed the value of the home," "the borrower (or the borrower’s estate) is generally not required to repay any additional loan balance in excess of the value of the home."[1] In Canada, the loan balance cannot exceed the fair market value of the home by law.


  Regulators and academics have given mixed commentary on the reverse mortgage market. Some economists argue that reverse mortgages allow the elderly to smooth out their income and consumption patterns over time, and thus may provide welfare benefits.[2][3] However, regulatory authorities, such as the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, argue that reverse mortgages are "complex products and difficult for consumers to understand," especially in light of "misleading advertising," low-quality counseling, and "risk of fraud and other scams."[1] Moreover, the Bureau claims that many consumers do not use reverse mortgages for the positive, consumption-smoothing purposes advanced by economists.[1] In Canada, the borrower must seek independent legal advice before being approved for a reverse mortgage.

Ty Laffoon
Business Development Manager
Prime Mortgage Loans
1660 Hotel Circle North Suite 716
San Diego , Ca.  92108
Office   619-630-0396
Cell       619-767-8687

Fax       619.363.9997

VA Loans ask Ty Laffoon



 Are you a Veteran ? Looking for a VA Loan . We can help you and find out if you are Eligible .WE DO  NO COST VA LOANS IN CALIFORNIA ONLY . Call or email us for more information



Ty Laffoon
Business Development Manager
Prime Mortgage Loans
1660 Hotel Circle North Suite 716
San Diego , Ca.  92108
Office   619-630-0396
Cell       619-767-8687

Fax       619.363.9997

ty@primemortgageloans.net



Qualify Now!! http://pbsd.primemortgageloans.net 

Feds meet on rates next week

This week's Federal Reserve meeting is shaping up to be the most dramatic in recent memory, with economists divided on whether the central bank will raise its benchmark interest rate for the first time in nearly a decade.
A hike would mark the beginning of the end of an extraordinary era of Fed easy money since the 2008 financial crisis that has kept borrowing costs historically low for consumers and businesses, and underpinned the six-year bull market. The Fed meets Wednesday and Thursday.
Of 19 economists and investment strategists surveyed by Action Economics on Friday, 11, or 58%, predict the Fed will delay the move after recent turmoil in financial markets — a share that has risen steadily over the past two weeks.
"You could add more volatility and more hesitation and fright to markets that are already fearful," says Diane Swonk, chief economist of Mesirow Financial.
Ty Laffoon   


Qualify Now!! http://pbsd.primemortgageloans.net  

Monday, July 20, 2015

Bidding wars return to home market

They  have been searching for a house in the Denver area for four months at prices up to $275,000. They made offers on six homes—and were outbid on each one.
“When we first started looking, you had to pay $10,000 over” list price to win the bidding, Ms. D said. “Then, as the weeks went by, it went up to $20,000. And now it’s up to $30,000 and $40,000.”
Ms. D , a 28-year-old office coordinator, said she and her husband, a 30-year-old merchandiser, hope that as the market slows down this winter, “people will put a halt on being so crazy.”
Bidding wars, a hallmark of last decade’s housing boom, are making a comeback in a number of metro areas across the U.S. But while the earlier wars reflected enthusiasm fueled by easy-money mortgages, the current froth stems from a market short of homes for sale.
The reasons for the scant supply are myriad, including a much-slower-than-expected recovery in home construction. Yet an equally significant problem is that millions of people aren’t listing their homes for sale because they suspect they can’t qualify for a new mortgage, can’t afford the costs associated with a sale or fear that they won’t prevail in the scrum for the few houses available.
At the end of May, there were 2.3 million existing U.S. homes for sale, enough supply to last 5.1 months at the current sales pace. That is below the six to seven months of supply that the National Association of Realtors says is needed for a balanced market.
But in more than one-third of the 300 largest metropolitan areas tracked by Realtor.com, homes listed for sale in June had been on the market for a median of less than two months. A low median figure indicates rapid turnover in inventory as demand for homes exceeds supply.
Those include big markets like San Francisco, with a median time on market of 27 days, and Dallas at 38 days, as well as smaller markets like Vallejo, Calif., at 26 days and Kennewick, Wash., at 36 days.
The tightest market in June was Santa Rosa, Calif., a relatively affordable Bay Area suburb, where the median time a home was on the market was 24 days.
In those markets with limited supply, bidding wars tend to push prices higher, creating price bubbles. According to Realtor.com, the $580,000 median listing price in Santa Rosa is up nearly 10% from a year ago. That handily outpaces the national average increase in resale prices, which the National Association of Realtors calculates at 7.9%. Realtor.com is operated by Move Inc., which like The Wall Street Journal is owned by News Corp.
The low supply of homes reflects a reluctance or inability of owners to sell their current house or apartment and trade up to their next, often larger, one. Some remain skittish about the economy, their own finances or their ability to qualify for a mortgage. Others can’t sell because they are underwater, meaning they owe more on their mortgages than the homes are worth.
Even though U.S. home prices are up 31% in the past five years, 15.4% of homes—an estimated 7.9 million—remained underwater in the first quarter, according to real estate website Zillow. The long term average is 3% to 5%, Zillow says. These owners can’t sell unless they have thousands, sometimes tens of thousands, of dollars on hand to pay the shortfall on their old mortgage and finance costs of selling and moving.
Another pressure on housing inventories is growth in U.S. household formation. The U.S. added roughly 1.5 million households in the first quarter from a year earlier, though almost all were formed by renters.
Some economists say renters will add demand to the housing market as steep rent increases prompt them to purchase. Apartment rents have risen nearly 16% nationwide since 2010, according to real-estate research firm Reis Inc.
Meanwhile, at least 2.6 million homes have been taken out of the market since 2008 after investors purchased them and converted them to rentals, according to Stephen Kim, a housing analyst at the U.S. unit of Barclays PLC.
“Today’s seller is tomorrow’s buyer, and people aren’t selling mainly because they don’t have anything to move to or they can’t afford what they find,” said Nela R, chief   “We’re in this vicious cycle of low inventory, and there isn’t a short-term fix. Everyone thought the buyers would take a long time to recover from the downturn. But it’s not just the buyers, it’s the sellers.”
Earlier this year, Car, a 39-year-old  specialist, considered selling her, Ore., townhome, appraised at $400,000. But she changed her mind out of concern that she wouldn’t be able to find another home.